Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Assessment u/s 153C - the normal presumption is that document belongs to searched person. It is for the AO to rebut that presumption and come to a conclusion or "satisfaction" that the document in fact belongs to somebody else based on some cogent material - no error much less an error of law could be said to have been committed in taking the view that there is no cogent material for arriving at the substantive satisfaction
Assessment u/s 153C - the normal presumption is that document belongs to searched person. It is for the AO to rebut that presumption and come to a conclusion or "satisfaction" that the document in fact belongs to somebody else based on some cogent material - no error much less an error of law could be said to have been committed in taking the view that there is no cogent material for arriving at the substantive satisfaction
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.