Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment could come into play - amount has been shown as receivable as “Loan & Advances” from the department - it can be safely concluded that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the appellant to any other person - refund allowable
Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment could come into play - amount has been shown as receivable as “Loan & Advances” from the department - it can be safely concluded that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the appellant to any other person - refund allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.