<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund of CENVAT Credit Allowed: No Unjust Enrichment as Duty Not Transferred to Another Party Per Records.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48295</link>
    <description>Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment could come into play - amount has been shown as receivable as “Loan &amp; Advances” from the department - it can be safely concluded that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the appellant to any other person - refund allowable</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:33:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:33:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund of CENVAT Credit Allowed: No Unjust Enrichment as Duty Not Transferred to Another Party Per Records.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48295</link>
      <description>Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment could come into play - amount has been shown as receivable as “Loan &amp; Advances” from the department - it can be safely concluded that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the appellant to any other person - refund allowable</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:33:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>