Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment could come into play - amount has been shown as receivable as “Loan & Advances” from the department - it can be safely concluded that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the appellant to any other person - refund allowable
Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment could come into play - amount has been shown as receivable as “Loan & Advances” from the department - it can be safely concluded that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the appellant to any other person - refund allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.