Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment could come into play - amount has been shown as receivable as “Loan & Advances” from the department - it can be safely concluded that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the appellant to any other person - refund allowable
Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment could come into play - amount has been shown as receivable as “Loan & Advances” from the department - it can be safely concluded that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the appellant to any other person - refund allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.