Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - specified domestic transactions - effect of omission of 92BA(1) w.e.f. 1.4.2017 - the order has been revised purely on the basis that the AO has not referred to determine the ALP to the TPO - Since the provision itself stood omitted at the time when the order was passed by the Pr. CIT, the impugned order cannot be sustained, hence is hereby quashed
Revision u/s 263 - specified domestic transactions - effect of omission of 92BA(1) w.e.f. 1.4.2017 - the order has been revised purely on the basis that the AO has not referred to determine the ALP to the TPO - Since the provision itself stood omitted at the time when the order was passed by the Pr. CIT, the impugned order cannot be sustained, hence is hereby quashed
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.