<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Order Quashed: Section 263 Revision Overturned Due to Omission of Section 92BA(1) Effective April 1, 2017.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48291</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - specified domestic transactions - effect of omission of 92BA(1) w.e.f. 1.4.2017 - the order has been revised purely on the basis that the AO has not referred to determine the ALP to the TPO - Since the provision itself stood omitted at the time when the order was passed by the Pr. CIT, the impugned order cannot be sustained, hence is hereby quashed</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:34:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:34:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Order Quashed: Section 263 Revision Overturned Due to Omission of Section 92BA(1) Effective April 1, 2017.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48291</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - specified domestic transactions - effect of omission of 92BA(1) w.e.f. 1.4.2017 - the order has been revised purely on the basis that the AO has not referred to determine the ALP to the TPO - Since the provision itself stood omitted at the time when the order was passed by the Pr. CIT, the impugned order cannot be sustained, hence is hereby quashed</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:34:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>