Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Addition u/s 68 - one of director of company admitted that the entire investment was bogus - Blank receipts after cash deposit were obtained from the share holders - when two Revenue authorities and the Tribunal concurrently came to the conclusion that the assessee failed to discharge the initial burden envisaged u/s 68 - additions should be confirmed as there is no perversity in findings
Addition u/s 68 - one of director of company admitted that the entire investment was bogus - Blank receipts after cash deposit were obtained from the share holders - when two Revenue authorities and the Tribunal concurrently came to the conclusion that the assessee failed to discharge the initial burden envisaged u/s 68 - additions should be confirmed as there is no perversity in findings
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.