Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Disallowance u/s.36(1)(iii) - borrowed amount was invested in shares of a associate company - all the details of investments and working of interest paid has been provided to the Department - asking evidences that income will be generate to the assessee at this stage is not the requirement of Section 36(1)(iii) fistly and secondly it is just asking for some hypothetical evidences - deduction allowable
Disallowance u/s.36(1)(iii) - borrowed amount was invested in shares of a associate company - all the details of investments and working of interest paid has been provided to the Department - asking evidences that income will be generate to the assessee at this stage is not the requirement of Section 36(1)(iii) fistly and secondly it is just asking for some hypothetical evidences - deduction allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
