Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Profiteering - footwear - benefit of rate reduction of GST from 18% to 5% - It is evident that the Respondent had increased the base price of the product when the rate of tax was reduced - non reduction of price is contravened the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 - directed to reduce the price of the product and also pay profiteered amount and SCN for penalty
Profiteering - footwear - benefit of rate reduction of GST from 18% to 5% - It is evident that the Respondent had increased the base price of the product when the rate of tax was reduced - non reduction of price is contravened the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 - directed to reduce the price of the product and also pay profiteered amount and SCN for penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.