Respondent ordered to refund profiteered amount, deposit into Consumer Welfare Fund, face penalty for incorrect invoices.

The judgment found that the respondent had contravened Section 171 of the CGST Act by not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction on footwear. The respondent was directed to refund the profiteered amount of Rs. 6,55,307, depositing it into the Consumer Welfare Fund, and pay interest. Additionally, the respondent faced a penalty for issuing incorrect invoices. The order mandated price reductions, refunds, deposits, and issuance of a show-cause notice for penalty imposition.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Allegation of profiteering by not passing on GST rate reduction benefits.
2. Examination of whether the benefit of GST rate reduction was passed on.
3. Determination of the amount of profiteering.
4. Directions for refund and deposit of profiteered amount.
5. Imposition of penalty for issuing incorrect invoices.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Allegation of Profiteering:
An application was filed alleging that the respondent did not pass on the benefit of GST rate reduction from 18% to 5% on footwear priced between Rs. 500 and Rs. 1,000, thus contravening Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The applicant claimed that despite the rate reduction, the respondent maintained the same selling price, thereby indulging in profiteering.

2. Examination of GST Rate Reduction Benefit:
The DGAP investigated whether the benefit of GST rate reduction was passed on. It was found that the respondent had increased the base price of the footwear to maintain the pre-GST reduction cum-tax price. This increase in base price negated the effect of the reduced GST rate, thus denying the benefit to the recipients. The investigation covered the period from 27.07.2018 to 30.11.2018.

3. Determination of Profiteering Amount:
The DGAP's report revealed that the respondent supplied 6,380 footwear items, out of which 1,451 were impacted by the GST rate reduction. For 831 of these products, the profiteering amount was calculated based on the difference in base prices before and after the rate reduction. The total profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 6,55,307, including Rs. 77 for the applicant.

4. Directions for Refund and Deposit:
The respondent was directed to reduce the prices of the products to reflect the GST rate reduction and refund Rs. 77 to the applicant along with 18% interest. The remaining profiteered amount of Rs. 6,55,230 was to be deposited into the Consumer Welfare Fund of the Central and State Governments in a 50:50 ratio. The respondent had already paid Rs. 6,55,310 into the Central Consumer Welfare Fund, and was further directed to pay 18% interest on this amount within three months.

5. Imposition of Penalty:
The respondent issued incorrect invoices by not showing the correct base prices and collected additional GST on the increased prices. This act was in contravention of the CGST Act, 2017, and constituted an offense under Section 122 (1) (i). A notice was to be issued to the respondent to show cause why a penalty should not be imposed under Section 122 of the CGST Act, 2017, read with Rule 133 (3) (d) of the CGST Rules, 2017.

Conclusion:
The judgment concluded that the respondent had indeed contravened the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, by not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction. The respondent was directed to make necessary refunds and deposits, and a show-cause notice for penalty imposition was to be issued. The order was to be sent to the concerned parties and authorities free of cost.

---