Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Default in furnishing TCS statements - statement submitted u/s 200(3) are to be processed u/s 200A and then AO can levy fine u/s 234E - once a procedure has been provided by the legislature, then it does not give discretion to the AO to levy fine without processing the statements - Merely mentioning S. 234E would not become an order u/s 234E in isolation - appeal maintainable
Default in furnishing TCS statements - statement submitted u/s 200(3) are to be processed u/s 200A and then AO can levy fine u/s 234E - once a procedure has been provided by the legislature, then it does not give discretion to the AO to levy fine without processing the statements - Merely mentioning S. 234E would not become an order u/s 234E in isolation - appeal maintainable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.