Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Default in furnishing TCS statements - statement submitted u/s 200(3) are to be processed u/s 200A and then AO can levy fine u/s 234E - once a procedure has been provided by the legislature, then it does not give discretion to the AO to levy fine without processing the statements - Merely mentioning S. 234E would not become an order u/s 234E in isolation - appeal maintainable
Default in furnishing TCS statements - statement submitted u/s 200(3) are to be processed u/s 200A and then AO can levy fine u/s 234E - once a procedure has been provided by the legislature, then it does not give discretion to the AO to levy fine without processing the statements - Merely mentioning S. 234E would not become an order u/s 234E in isolation - appeal maintainable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
