Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Addition u/s 40A(2) - expenditure is excessive or unreasonable having regard to the FMV of the goods, services or facilities - the assessee and Nimbus in negotiations with BCCI agreed neither to refund for the cancelled match nor to charge for the additional match - difference in fee did not prevent the parties from agreeing to fresh contract as to how to adjust the revenue proceeds - no addition
Addition u/s 40A(2) - expenditure is excessive or unreasonable having regard to the FMV of the goods, services or facilities - the assessee and Nimbus in negotiations with BCCI agreed neither to refund for the cancelled match nor to charge for the additional match - difference in fee did not prevent the parties from agreeing to fresh contract as to how to adjust the revenue proceeds - no addition
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
