Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Imposition of penalty - input credit of 5% retention amount - appellant had sufficient balance in cenvat account therefore it cannot be said that they had utilised the same - there was no malafide intention on its part and it was only a bonafide error, which was rectified immediately on pointing out by the audit party - no penalty is imposable on the Appellant
Imposition of penalty - input credit of 5% retention amount - appellant had sufficient balance in cenvat account therefore it cannot be said that they had utilised the same - there was no malafide intention on its part and it was only a bonafide error, which was rectified immediately on pointing out by the audit party - no penalty is imposable on the Appellant
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
