<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>No Penalty for Appellant Due to Bona Fide Error in Input Credit; Sufficient CENVAT Balance Confirmed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46932</link>
    <description>Imposition of penalty - input credit of 5% retention amount - appellant had sufficient balance in cenvat account therefore it cannot be said that they had utilised the same - there was no malafide intention on its part and it was only a bonafide error, which was rectified immediately on pointing out by the audit party - no penalty is imposable on the Appellant</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:39:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>No Penalty for Appellant Due to Bona Fide Error in Input Credit; Sufficient CENVAT Balance Confirmed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46932</link>
      <description>Imposition of penalty - input credit of 5% retention amount - appellant had sufficient balance in cenvat account therefore it cannot be said that they had utilised the same - there was no malafide intention on its part and it was only a bonafide error, which was rectified immediately on pointing out by the audit party - no penalty is imposable on the Appellant</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:39:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>