Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Imposition of penalty - input credit of 5% retention amount - appellant had sufficient balance in cenvat account therefore it cannot be said that they had utilised the same - there was no malafide intention on its part and it was only a bonafide error, which was rectified immediately on pointing out by the audit party - no penalty is imposable on the Appellant
Imposition of penalty - input credit of 5% retention amount - appellant had sufficient balance in cenvat account therefore it cannot be said that they had utilised the same - there was no malafide intention on its part and it was only a bonafide error, which was rectified immediately on pointing out by the audit party - no penalty is imposable on the Appellant
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
