Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Imposition of penalty - input credit of 5% retention amount - appellant had sufficient balance in cenvat account therefore it cannot be said that they had utilised the same - there was no malafide intention on its part and it was only a bonafide error, which was rectified immediately on pointing out by the audit party - no penalty is imposable on the Appellant
Imposition of penalty - input credit of 5% retention amount - appellant had sufficient balance in cenvat account therefore it cannot be said that they had utilised the same - there was no malafide intention on its part and it was only a bonafide error, which was rectified immediately on pointing out by the audit party - no penalty is imposable on the Appellant
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
