Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 - AO recorded in order that assessee had “duly furnished the details of opening stock, closing stock, sales and production i.e. consumption of paddy etc.” this was a case of ‘no inquiry’ - CIT has not undertaken any independent inquiry to contradict the conclusions reached by the AO and to demonstrate that the order of the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - revision not sustainable
Revision u/s 263 - AO recorded in order that assessee had “duly furnished the details of opening stock, closing stock, sales and production i.e. consumption of paddy etc.” this was a case of ‘no inquiry’ - CIT has not undertaken any independent inquiry to contradict the conclusions reached by the AO and to demonstrate that the order of the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - revision not sustainable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.