Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Winding up of respondent company under Section 433 (e) on the ground of inability to pay the debt - proof of bonafide debt - It is settled position in law that winding up proceeding cannot be used as a tool to recover the bona-fidely disputed debts as a substitute for recovery suit.
Winding up of respondent company under Section 433 (e) on the ground of inability to pay the debt - proof of bonafide debt - It is settled position in law that winding up proceeding cannot be used as a tool to recover the bona-fidely disputed debts as a substitute for recovery suit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.