<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Company Faces Winding Up u/s 433(e) for Unpaid Debts; Not a Substitute for Disputed Debt Recovery.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41094</link>
    <description>Winding up of respondent company under Section 433 (e) on the ground of inability to pay the debt - proof of bonafide debt - It is settled position in law that winding up proceeding cannot be used as a tool to recover the bona-fidely disputed debts as a substitute for recovery suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:35:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Company Faces Winding Up u/s 433(e) for Unpaid Debts; Not a Substitute for Disputed Debt Recovery.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41094</link>
      <description>Winding up of respondent company under Section 433 (e) on the ground of inability to pay the debt - proof of bonafide debt - It is settled position in law that winding up proceeding cannot be used as a tool to recover the bona-fidely disputed debts as a substitute for recovery suit.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:35:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>