Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Reopening of assessment - omission to mention Section 143(2) - the assessee had ample notice of the case it had to answer and the assessee availed of those opportunities by answering the case against it. In such a situation, we are not prepared to think that there was absence of notice u/s 143(2) or that any prejudice was caused to the assessee in defending the case against it - HC
Reopening of assessment - omission to mention Section 143(2) - the assessee had ample notice of the case it had to answer and the assessee availed of those opportunities by answering the case against it. In such a situation, we are not prepared to think that there was absence of notice u/s 143(2) or that any prejudice was caused to the assessee in defending the case against it - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
