<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Finds No Prejudice in Reopened Assessment Despite Omission of Section 143(2) Notice; Assessee Fully Informed and Engaged.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35993</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment - omission to mention Section 143(2) - the assessee had ample notice of the case it had to answer and the assessee availed of those opportunities by answering the case against it. In such a situation, we are not prepared to think that there was absence of notice u/s 143(2) or that any prejudice was caused to the assessee in defending the case against it - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:58:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:58:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Finds No Prejudice in Reopened Assessment Despite Omission of Section 143(2) Notice; Assessee Fully Informed and Engaged.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35993</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment - omission to mention Section 143(2) - the assessee had ample notice of the case it had to answer and the assessee availed of those opportunities by answering the case against it. In such a situation, we are not prepared to think that there was absence of notice u/s 143(2) or that any prejudice was caused to the assessee in defending the case against it - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:58:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>