Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim of excess duty paid - valuation of Physician's sample - The assessable value, as indicated in the 2002 circular, is 115% of the cost of production. The Tribunal having come to this conclusion, in our opinion ought not to have taken recourse to the 2003 circular which adverts to the CAS-4 methodology - matter remanded back to ascertain cost of production - HC
Refund claim of excess duty paid - valuation of Physician's sample - The assessable value, as indicated in the 2002 circular, is 115% of the cost of production. The Tribunal having come to this conclusion, in our opinion ought not to have taken recourse to the 2003 circular which adverts to the CAS-4 methodology - matter remanded back to ascertain cost of production - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
