<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund Claim Remanded Due to Incorrect Methodology; Tribunal Misapplied 2003 Circular Instead of 2002 Guidelines for Valuation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35453</link>
    <description>Refund claim of excess duty paid - valuation of Physician&#039;s sample - The assessable value, as indicated in the 2002 circular, is 115% of the cost of production. The Tribunal having come to this conclusion, in our opinion ought not to have taken recourse to the 2003 circular which adverts to the CAS-4 methodology - matter remanded back to ascertain cost of production - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:37:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund Claim Remanded Due to Incorrect Methodology; Tribunal Misapplied 2003 Circular Instead of 2002 Guidelines for Valuation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35453</link>
      <description>Refund claim of excess duty paid - valuation of Physician&#039;s sample - The assessable value, as indicated in the 2002 circular, is 115% of the cost of production. The Tribunal having come to this conclusion, in our opinion ought not to have taken recourse to the 2003 circular which adverts to the CAS-4 methodology - matter remanded back to ascertain cost of production - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:37:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>