Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the clandestine removal of the goods but non-receipt of the inputs and fraudulent availment of the credit without physical receipt of the inputs - the penalty upon the appellant imposed under Rule 26 will not sustain - AT
Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the clandestine removal of the goods but non-receipt of the inputs and fraudulent availment of the credit without physical receipt of the inputs - the penalty upon the appellant imposed under Rule 26 will not sustain - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
