<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/r 26 for Fraudulent Credit Claims Deemed Unsustainable Due to Lack of Physical Input Receipt.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34729</link>
    <description>Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the clandestine removal of the goods but non-receipt of the inputs and fraudulent availment of the credit without physical receipt of the inputs - the penalty upon the appellant imposed under Rule 26 will not sustain - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 10:57:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 10:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/r 26 for Fraudulent Credit Claims Deemed Unsustainable Due to Lack of Physical Input Receipt.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34729</link>
      <description>Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the clandestine removal of the goods but non-receipt of the inputs and fraudulent availment of the credit without physical receipt of the inputs - the penalty upon the appellant imposed under Rule 26 will not sustain - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 10:57:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>