Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Natural justice - The petitioner is right in contending that he had no clue as to whether or not his request for adjournment had been considered. Therefore, quite naturally, the petitioner would have been taken by surprise, when the impugned orders were passed - matter restored - HC
Natural justice - The petitioner is right in contending that he had no clue as to whether or not his request for adjournment had been considered. Therefore, quite naturally, the petitioner would have been taken by surprise, when the impugned orders were passed - matter restored - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.