<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Restores Case for Reconsideration Citing Breach of Natural Justice Due to Uncommunicated Adjournment Request Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33778</link>
    <description>Natural justice - The petitioner is right in contending that he had no clue as to whether or not his request for adjournment had been considered. Therefore, quite naturally, the petitioner would have been taken by surprise, when the impugned orders were passed - matter restored - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:59:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Restores Case for Reconsideration Citing Breach of Natural Justice Due to Uncommunicated Adjournment Request Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33778</link>
      <description>Natural justice - The petitioner is right in contending that he had no clue as to whether or not his request for adjournment had been considered. Therefore, quite naturally, the petitioner would have been taken by surprise, when the impugned orders were passed - matter restored - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:59:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>