Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
CENVAT credit - captive consumption - The main ground for denial is that the power plant does not belong to appellant (Hindalco) and services availed by subsidiary company (Renusagar Power Plant) cannot be given credit to appellant - once the units are merged / amalgamated, credit is to be allowed - AT
CENVAT credit - captive consumption - The main ground for denial is that the power plant does not belong to appellant (Hindalco) and services availed by subsidiary company (Renusagar Power Plant) cannot be given credit to appellant - once the units are merged / amalgamated, credit is to be allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.