Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Refund claim - excess duty paid - rejection on the ground of unjust enrichment - We are unhappy at the manner in which the Tribunal has dealt with the Appeals - the Tribunal committed serious errors of law apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal did not elaborate as to how, in this case, the question of limitation can be said to be a pure legal issue. - HC
Refund claim - excess duty paid - rejection on the ground of unjust enrichment - We are unhappy at the manner in which the Tribunal has dealt with the Appeals - the Tribunal committed serious errors of law apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal did not elaborate as to how, in this case, the question of limitation can be said to be a pure legal issue. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.