<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal&#039;s Rejection of Duty Refund Claim Criticized for Legal Errors and Misinterpretation of Limitation Issues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33333</link>
    <description>Refund claim - excess duty paid - rejection on the ground of unjust enrichment - We are unhappy at the manner in which the Tribunal has dealt with the Appeals - the Tribunal committed serious errors of law apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal did not elaborate as to how, in this case, the question of limitation can be said to be a pure legal issue. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:43:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:43:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal&#039;s Rejection of Duty Refund Claim Criticized for Legal Errors and Misinterpretation of Limitation Issues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33333</link>
      <description>Refund claim - excess duty paid - rejection on the ground of unjust enrichment - We are unhappy at the manner in which the Tribunal has dealt with the Appeals - the Tribunal committed serious errors of law apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal did not elaborate as to how, in this case, the question of limitation can be said to be a pure legal issue. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:43:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>