Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Classification - - vehicle was hired out to third person for the purpose of his journey - There was no tour actually conducted by the appellant in the present case. Neither the appellant adduced evidence in that regard nor also any of the circumstantial evidence could demonstrate in its favour to treat the appellant as a tour operator. - appellant’s claim fails on the plea of classification as tour operator - AT
Classification - - vehicle was hired out to third person for the purpose of his journey - There was no tour actually conducted by the appellant in the present case. Neither the appellant adduced evidence in that regard nor also any of the circumstantial evidence could demonstrate in its favour to treat the appellant as a tour operator. - appellant’s claim fails on the plea of classification as tour operator - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
