<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Claim for Tour Operator Status Denied Due to Lack of Evidence on Vehicle Rental Use.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30636</link>
    <description>Classification - - vehicle was hired out to third person for the purpose of his journey - There was no tour actually conducted by the appellant in the present case. Neither the appellant adduced evidence in that regard nor also any of the circumstantial evidence could demonstrate in its favour to treat the appellant as a tour operator. - appellant’s claim fails on the plea of classification as tour operator - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:35:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Claim for Tour Operator Status Denied Due to Lack of Evidence on Vehicle Rental Use.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30636</link>
      <description>Classification - - vehicle was hired out to third person for the purpose of his journey - There was no tour actually conducted by the appellant in the present case. Neither the appellant adduced evidence in that regard nor also any of the circumstantial evidence could demonstrate in its favour to treat the appellant as a tour operator. - appellant’s claim fails on the plea of classification as tour operator - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:35:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>