Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Classification - - vehicle was hired out to third person for the purpose of his journey - There was no tour actually conducted by the appellant in the present case. Neither the appellant adduced evidence in that regard nor also any of the circumstantial evidence could demonstrate in its favour to treat the appellant as a tour operator. - appellant’s claim fails on the plea of classification as tour operator - AT
Classification - - vehicle was hired out to third person for the purpose of his journey - There was no tour actually conducted by the appellant in the present case. Neither the appellant adduced evidence in that regard nor also any of the circumstantial evidence could demonstrate in its favour to treat the appellant as a tour operator. - appellant’s claim fails on the plea of classification as tour operator - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
