Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Wrong Claim of exemption from CVD - respondents claimed classification of goods as “medicament” under Chapter 30 with intention to avail exemption of CVD at NIL rate - intention of the respondent is established the contravention u/s 111 for confiscation is fully justified - Demand of duty confirmed - however redemption fine and penalty reduced - AT
Wrong Claim of exemption from CVD - respondents claimed classification of goods as “medicament” under Chapter 30 with intention to avail exemption of CVD at NIL rate - intention of the respondent is established the contravention u/s 111 for confiscation is fully justified - Demand of duty confirmed - however redemption fine and penalty reduced - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.