<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Misclassification of Goods as &quot;Medicament&quot; for CVD Exemption Confirmed; Confiscation u/s 111 Justified, Penalty Reduced.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27091</link>
    <description>Wrong Claim of exemption from CVD - respondents claimed classification of goods as “medicament” under Chapter 30 with intention to avail exemption of CVD at NIL rate - intention of the respondent is established the contravention u/s 111 for confiscation is fully justified - Demand of duty confirmed - however redemption fine and penalty reduced - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:45:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Misclassification of Goods as &quot;Medicament&quot; for CVD Exemption Confirmed; Confiscation u/s 111 Justified, Penalty Reduced.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27091</link>
      <description>Wrong Claim of exemption from CVD - respondents claimed classification of goods as “medicament” under Chapter 30 with intention to avail exemption of CVD at NIL rate - intention of the respondent is established the contravention u/s 111 for confiscation is fully justified - Demand of duty confirmed - however redemption fine and penalty reduced - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:45:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>