Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Enhancement in value of goods - Revenue has not also explained why Rule 5 and 6 which relate to similar or identical goods should not have been considered when the appellant have given the price of contemporaneous goods - Even if the contemporaneous goods do not indicate the brand, it was duty of Revenue to examine documents relating to contemporaneous imports but it failed to do so - AT
Enhancement in value of goods - Revenue has not also explained why Rule 5 and 6 which relate to similar or identical goods should not have been considered when the appellant have given the price of contemporaneous goods - Even if the contemporaneous goods do not indicate the brand, it was duty of Revenue to examine documents relating to contemporaneous imports but it failed to do so - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
