Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Payment made on account of royalty to State Govt - payment of royalty in excess of 20% - Section 6A(4) of the Oilfield (Exploration and Development Act), 1948 - Certainly, we cannot liken it to hafta or extortion money, which appears to have been the intention - the amounts, which were paid, would not incur the opprobrium of being in violation of Section 37 - expenditure allowed - HC
Payment made on account of royalty to State Govt - payment of royalty in excess of 20% - Section 6A(4) of the Oilfield (Exploration and Development Act), 1948 - Certainly, we cannot liken it to hafta or extortion money, which appears to have been the intention - the amounts, which were paid, would not incur the opprobrium of being in violation of Section 37 - expenditure allowed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
