<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Excessive Royalties to State Legal Under Oilfield Act, Section 6A(4); Not Extortion, Allowed as Tax Deduction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23990</link>
    <description>Payment made on account of royalty to State Govt - payment of royalty in excess of 20% - Section 6A(4) of the Oilfield (Exploration and Development Act), 1948 - Certainly, we cannot liken it to hafta or extortion money, which appears to have been the intention - the amounts, which were paid, would not incur the opprobrium of being in violation of Section 37 - expenditure allowed - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:25:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:25:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Excessive Royalties to State Legal Under Oilfield Act, Section 6A(4); Not Extortion, Allowed as Tax Deduction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23990</link>
      <description>Payment made on account of royalty to State Govt - payment of royalty in excess of 20% - Section 6A(4) of the Oilfield (Exploration and Development Act), 1948 - Certainly, we cannot liken it to hafta or extortion money, which appears to have been the intention - the amounts, which were paid, would not incur the opprobrium of being in violation of Section 37 - expenditure allowed - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:25:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>