Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Appellant is trying to confuse the issue by stating that ceramic core is being captively consumed in the manufacture of porcelain insulator and therefore the import of ball clay should be allowed. The said claim of the appellant cannot be accepted - HC
Appellant is trying to confuse the issue by stating that ceramic core is being captively consumed in the manufacture of porcelain insulator and therefore the import of ball clay should be allowed. The said claim of the appellant cannot be accepted - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
