<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rejects Appellant&#039;s Claim on Ceramic Core Use in Porcelain Insulators for Ball Clay Import Justification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20977</link>
    <description>Appellant is trying to confuse the issue by stating that ceramic core is being captively consumed in the manufacture of porcelain insulator and therefore the import of ball clay should be allowed. The said claim of the appellant cannot be accepted - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:31:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rejects Appellant&#039;s Claim on Ceramic Core Use in Porcelain Insulators for Ball Clay Import Justification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20977</link>
      <description>Appellant is trying to confuse the issue by stating that ceramic core is being captively consumed in the manufacture of porcelain insulator and therefore the import of ball clay should be allowed. The said claim of the appellant cannot be accepted - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:31:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>