Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Trademark infringement - Use of confusingly similar mark - Though the plaintiff needn’t prove actual damages suffered by him, it is imperative that the Court while awarding damages considers the averments made in the plaint coupled with an assessment of the extent of damage likely caused or to be caused. - HC
Trademark infringement - Use of confusingly similar mark - Though the plaintiff needn’t prove actual damages suffered by him, it is imperative that the Court while awarding damages considers the averments made in the plaint coupled with an assessment of the extent of damage likely caused or to be caused. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.