Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Electronic uploading of Dispute Resolution Panel directions on the ITBA portal constitutes valid and sufficient service for calculating the deadline for a final assessment under section 144C(13). Where directions were uploaded in October 2025, the final assessment had to be completed by the end of November 2025. Completion in December 2025 exceeded the prescribed limitation period, rendering the final assessment beyond jurisdiction and time-barred. Other grounds challenging the assessment remain open because limitation disposed of the matter.
Electronic uploading of Dispute Resolution Panel directions on the ITBA portal constitutes valid and sufficient service for calculating the deadline for a final assessment under section 144C(13). Where directions were uploaded in October 2025, the final assessment had to be completed by the end of November 2025. Completion in December 2025 exceeded the prescribed limitation period, rendering the final assessment beyond jurisdiction and time-barred. Other grounds challenging the assessment remain open because limitation disposed of the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.