Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Alleged reuse of an e-way bill cannot justify detention and penalty where the goods are supported by an invoice, e-invoice and e-way bill without discrepancies in description, quantity, value or ownership. Re-transportation must be established by independent, cogent evidence that an earlier journey was completed or the goods were delivered; an inference from prior e-way bill verification alone is insufficient. Intention to evade tax cannot be presumed from suspicion, and the alleged falsity of a vehicle-repair bill must also be proved. The detention and penalty orders were set aside, and refund of the deposited amount was directed in accordance with law.
Alleged reuse of an e-way bill cannot justify detention and penalty where the goods are supported by an invoice, e-invoice and e-way bill without discrepancies in description, quantity, value or ownership. Re-transportation must be established by independent, cogent evidence that an earlier journey was completed or the goods were delivered; an inference from prior e-way bill verification alone is insufficient. Intention to evade tax cannot be presumed from suspicion, and the alleged falsity of a vehicle-repair bill must also be proved. The detention and penalty orders were set aside, and refund of the deposited amount was directed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
