https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103223 Alleged reuse of an e-way bill cannot justify detention and penalty where the goods are supported by an invoice, e-invoice and e-way bill without discrepancies in description, quantity, value or ownership. Re-transportation must be established by independent, cogent evidence that an earlier journey was completed or the goods were delivered; an inference from prior e-way bill verification alone is insufficient. Intention to evade tax cannot be presumed from suspicion, and the alleged falsity of a vehicle-repair bill must also be proved. The detention and penalty orders were set aside, and refund of the deposited amount was directed in accordance with law. en-us Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:41 +0530 Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103223 Alleged reuse of an e-way bill cannot justify detention and penalty where the goods are supported by an invoice, e-invoice and e-way bill without discrepancies in description, quantity, value or ownership. Re-transportation must be established by independent, cogent evidence that an earlier journey was completed or the goods were delivered; an inference from prior e-way bill verification alone is insufficient. Intention to evade tax cannot be presumed from suspicion, and the alleged falsity of a vehicle-repair bill must also be proved. The detention and penalty orders were set aside, and refund of the deposited amount was directed in accordance with law. Highlights GST Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:41 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103223