Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revisionary jurisdiction requires both an erroneous assessment order and prejudice to Revenue. It cannot be exercised merely because the revisionary authority considers that the Assessing Officer should have made further or different inquiries. Where the assessee disclosed material supporting indexed cost of acquisition and cost of improvement, and the Assessing Officer considered the explanation before accepting the claim, the assessment reflects a conscious view. Revision cannot therefore substitute the revisionary authority's opinion for the Assessing Officer's considered decision on the disclosed material.
Revisionary jurisdiction requires both an erroneous assessment order and prejudice to Revenue. It cannot be exercised merely because the revisionary authority considers that the Assessing Officer should have made further or different inquiries. Where the assessee disclosed material supporting indexed cost of acquisition and cost of improvement, and the Assessing Officer considered the explanation before accepting the claim, the assessment reflects a conscious view. Revision cannot therefore substitute the revisionary authority's opinion for the Assessing Officer's considered decision on the disclosed material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.