<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revisionary jurisdiction cannot replace an Assessing Officer&#039;s considered view after full disclosure and examination during assessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103217</link>
    <description>Revisionary jurisdiction requires both an erroneous assessment order and prejudice to Revenue. It cannot be exercised merely because the revisionary authority considers that the Assessing Officer should have made further or different inquiries. Where the assessee disclosed material supporting indexed cost of acquisition and cost of improvement, and the Assessing Officer considered the explanation before accepting the claim, the assessment reflects a conscious view. Revision cannot therefore substitute the revisionary authority&#039;s opinion for the Assessing Officer&#039;s considered decision on the disclosed material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revisionary jurisdiction cannot replace an Assessing Officer&#039;s considered view after full disclosure and examination during assessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103217</link>
      <description>Revisionary jurisdiction requires both an erroneous assessment order and prejudice to Revenue. It cannot be exercised merely because the revisionary authority considers that the Assessing Officer should have made further or different inquiries. Where the assessee disclosed material supporting indexed cost of acquisition and cost of improvement, and the Assessing Officer considered the explanation before accepting the claim, the assessment reflects a conscious view. Revision cannot therefore substitute the revisionary authority&#039;s opinion for the Assessing Officer&#039;s considered decision on the disclosed material.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>