Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Under TNMM, comparables for an assessee providing ITeS support...
Functional comparability under TNMM supported exclusion of ITeS comparables with R&D, intangibles, diversified operations, or unavailable segmental data.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Under TNMM, comparables for an assessee providing ITeS support services to its associated enterprise must be functionally similar and capable of reliable comparison. Tata Elxsi was unsuitable because its design and engineering, digital-content, R&D and software-development activities involved substantial intangibles. TTEC India Customer Solutions was unsuitable because its BPO, technology and AI-enhanced offerings differed from the tested ITeS support services. CHEERS was unsuitable because its mixed ITeS and other operations lacked segmental information. All three were excluded from the final comparable set; the issue of the assessee's unaudited segmental information remained open.
Under TNMM, comparables for an assessee providing ITeS support services to its associated enterprise must be functionally similar and capable of reliable comparison. Tata Elxsi was unsuitable because its design and engineering, digital-content, R&D and software-development activities involved substantial intangibles. TTEC India Customer Solutions was unsuitable because its BPO, technology and AI-enhanced offerings differed from the tested ITeS support services. CHEERS was unsuitable because its mixed ITeS and other operations lacked segmental information. All three were excluded from the final comparable set; the issue of the assessee's unaudited segmental information remained open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
