Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Composite GST assessment orders covering five distinct tax periods are unsustainable. Separate notices must be issued for each respective tax period, and the taxpayer must receive an opportunity of hearing before fresh assessment action is taken. The High Court declined to examine the assessment merits and set aside the composite order, subject to deposit of 20% of the disputed tax within the stipulated period. On default, the authorities may proceed in accordance with law. Fresh proceedings may be initiated separately for each tax period.
Composite GST assessment orders covering five distinct tax periods are unsustainable. Separate notices must be issued for each respective tax period, and the taxpayer must receive an opportunity of hearing before fresh assessment action is taken. The High Court declined to examine the assessment merits and set aside the composite order, subject to deposit of 20% of the disputed tax within the stipulated period. On default, the authorities may proceed in accordance with law. Fresh proceedings may be initiated separately for each tax period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
